There is an infection in our medicines. It is self serving as oppose to self healing, its sole purpose is not based on health but instead on wealth. Your health and or lack of it is a great way for the system to feed themselves on. Your lack of healthy well being is another way to control you and keep you dependent, compounding the victim mind set and the need for the system to support you instead of being self reliant and self supporting.
The same companies who own the access to your energy, literally own your access to your physical energy and healthy well being. So lets pan out a little and do some background.
Who own the Pharmaceutical companies
Pfizer "Working together for a healthier world"
Family owed by Erhart, and Pfizer
The largest research based pharmaceutical in the world are responsible for some of the largest poisonings of people and planet. It isnt in their interest that you get well because who will pay their huge settlements that they are sued for from asbestos poisoning to pollution. They make your "cures" from chemicals, derived from mother nature, patented and crushed up with additional chemical compounds that cause more side effects than you started off with that then, that's right, you need more pills for...What a money cow!!
The vaccinations and the discovery of what is in them compared to the amount of
The Image to the right is the Declaration of your recognition of Common Law as per the Magna Carta. This gives jurisdiction of your human being entity to common law courts instead of any other perceived one. eg. corporate law. Adhering to the Common Law no damage to person or their property.
Printing and signing and scanning back to [email protected]
This is a statement of your intention and jurisdiction.
The statement below that is Grant of Authority to Create Common Law court in your own community
The next image directly below is penalty charge notice recognising its non validity and counter.
The next image down is an Affidavit of Truth and to the right of that is removal of implied access notice.
We believe that current legalities are enforced to protect the corporations whilst trampling over your common human rights which are precedent in this country. We also urge anyone with a shred of common sense and caring for your community and self to state your jurisdiction whilst still possible. David Cameron is signing these rights away to Brussels in November and you are at the mercy of their "corporate " law if that is allowed by your apathy. Free Energy comes in all forms. Your human form is what is priceless and its yours, no one else's to profit from. You are NOT a Slave, a commodity or a subject of subject status.
You are FREE ENERGY.
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent
For purposes of this affidavit and attached process, if any, the term “THE CROWN and/or UNITED KINGDOM” means the corporation, and all agents, employees, subdivisions and representatives thereof, without any implied submission to the UNITED KINGDOM or such private corporate “statutes.”
I, a woman commonly known as of the family hereinafter “deponent” and “I” am competent to state the following matters that they are true, correct and complete, presented in good faith, and not intended to mislead.
Be it known to all courts, governments, and other UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN agencies, that the deponent, of the family is not a name, but a private sentient woman who is causing no harm to others. I am neither subject to any artificial entity anywhere, nor is any artificial entity subject to me. I neither dominate anyone, nor will I give consent to be dominated.
The UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN entity who bring a charge upon me must be able to clarify whether they represent Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth of the House of Windsor, who swore to uphold God’s law in her Coronation or “Her Majesty in right of England”, THE CROWN CORPORATION, who have no lawful right over me in statute law and must supply a signed contract between the deponent and UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN entity within 10 (TEN) days of the issue date of this affidavit. If no evidence is supplied, the deponent will win by default, as no evidence of contract has been shown to exist. There is no jurisdiction to prosecute the deponent, without a signed contract. I will inform the courts and file this affidavit.
I am not a "person" when such term is defined in statutes of THE CROWN and/or UNITED KINGDOM when such definition includes artificial entities. I give no consent to be treated as a CROWN state created entity which is only capable of exercising certain rights, privileges, or immunities, as specifically granted by UNITED KINGDOM governments and THE CROWN.
I voluntarily choose to comply with the man-made statute laws, which serve to bring harmony to society, but no such laws, nor their enforcers, have any authority over me. I am not in any jurisdiction, for I am not of subject status.
The UNITED KINGDOM is a corporation, an artificial entity and a legal fiction that operates in bankruptcy.
E.g(Rundells and East Dorset Council) is an artificial entity and a legal fiction that operates in bankruptcy.
are all artificial entities and legal fictions.
Consistent with the eternal tradition of natural common law, unless I have harmed or violated a human being, or his or her property, I have committed no crime; and am therefore not subject to any penalty.
Thus, be it known to all that I reserve my natural common law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And furthermore, the deponent does not accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended "benefit" of any hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
It is unlawful for any UNITED KINGDOM Police Officer, Government/corporate agent, official, employee or the like, to hold, incarcerate, detain, restrain and/or restrict the deponent against the deponent will at any time whatsoever. A fee of £100,000 will be levied if the deponent’s free will is violated under God’s law, without evidence provided.
Any party that would order, represent or persuade the deponent to falsely present the deponent as a UNITED KINGDOM citizen, vessel or person directly or by deception, device, misnomer, mistaken identity, warrant or indictment, real or imagined, would be engaging in Enticement to Slavery, without providing written evidence proving that the deponent had broken God’s law, agrees to award the Deponent £10,000 under tacit agreement.
It would be both a violation of law and a violation of the deponent’s God given unalienable rights if any UNITED KINGDOM government/corporative agent, officer or employee attempts to, or does in-fact, force, coerce, manipulate and/or deceive the deponent into receiving any form of medical treatment at anytime whatsoever, including but not limited to vaccinations. A fine of £1,000,000 will be levied upon the UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN agency enforcing this violation of free will upon the deponent.
The deponent is not liable for COUNCIL TAX or any artificial derivative thereof at any time whatsoever.
As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create obligations to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable to the deponent, and are null and void. If I have participated in any of the supposed "benefits" associated with these hidden contracts, I have done so under duress, for lack of any other practical alternative. I may have received such "benefits" but I have not accepted them in a manner that binds me to anything.
Any such participation does not constitute "acceptance" in contract law, because of the absence of full disclosure of any valid "offer," and voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion, under contract law. Without a valid voluntary offer and acceptance, knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no "meeting of the minds," and therefore no valid contract. Any supposed "contract" is therefore void, ab initio.
From my age of consent to the date affixed below, I have never signed a contract knowingly, willingly, intelligently, and voluntarily whereby I have waived my natural common law rights, and, as such, Take Notice that I revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio my signature on any and all contracts, agreements, forms, or any instrument which may be construed in any way to give any agency or department of any UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN government authority, venue, or jurisdiction over me.
The deponent chooses to continue to use a UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN instrument known as The British Passport, because there is no other way to travel outside of the UNITED KINGDOM.
Any party that alleges a liability against the deponent is obligated to produce an Affidavit of Liability to demonstrate such liability.
The deponent is in peaceful and lawful possession of the property known as xx xxxx xxxx xxxx, located on the geographical land mass commonly known as xxxx, xxxxx.
Typical examples of such compelled and pretended "benefits" are:
The use of Bank of England Notes to discharge my debts. I have used these only because in the United Kingdom, there is no other widely recognised currency.
The use of a bank account, with my signature on the bank signature card. If there is any hidden contract behind the bank signature card, my signature thereon gives no validity to it. The signature is only for verification of identity. I can be obligated to fulfill no hidden or unrevealed contract whatsoever, due to the absence of full disclosure and voluntary consent. Likewise, my use of the bank account thereof is due to the absence of a bank not associated with the Bank of England system. If there were there an alternative, I would be happy to use it. To not use any bank at all is impossible or very difficult, as everyone knows, in today's marketplace.
The use of a National Insurance number. The number normally assigned to persons of subject status, I use exceptionally, under duress, only because of the extreme inconvenience of operating without one in today's marketplace, where it is requested by banks, employers, lenders, and many other UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN government agencies and businesses. My reason for using it is not because I wish to participate in the Social Security system. Let it be known that I use the Social Security number assigned to me for information only.
The use of a driver's licence. Under common law, there is no legal requirement for me to have such a licence for travelling in my car. Technically, the unrevealed legal purpose of driver's licences is commercial in nature. Since I don't carry passengers for hire, there is no law requiring me to have a licence to travel for my own pleasure and that of my family and friends. However, because police officers lack education on this matter, should I be stopped for any reason and found to be without a licence, it is likely I would be ticketed and fined or obligated to appear in court. Therefore, under duress, I carry a licence to avoid extreme inconvenience.
State plates on my car. Similarly, even though technically, my car does not fit the legal definition of a "motor vehicle," which is used for commercial purposes, nevertheless, I have registered it with the DVLA and carry the state plates on it, because to have any other plates or no plates at all, causes me to run the risk of police officer harassment and extreme inconvenience.
Past tax returns filed. Any tax returns I may have filed in the past were filed due to the dishonest atmosphere of fear and intimidation created by HM Revenues & Customs (HMRC), not because there is any law requiring me to do so. Once I discovered that HMRC have been misinforming the public, I have felt it is my responsible duty to society to terminate my voluntary participation. Because no two-way contract was ever signed with full disclosure, there is nothing in any past filing of returns or payments that created any valid contract. Therefore, no legal obligation on my part was ever created.
Council tax: THE UNITED KINGDOM and/or THE CROWN artificial entities have never disclosed that it is voluntary to pay Council Tax, therefore any payment that I have made in the past was because of fear and intimidation and lack of truth. To have any lawful enforceable status to collect monies, there must be a contract in place showing a wet signature by both the deponent and the artificial entity. In addition, it is wrong for a Council to clearly state “bill” on the Council Tax Bill, when it is not a bill of exchange. It is illegal and fraudulent to mislabel a document that is specifically used to extract unlawful monies. The Local Government Finance Act 1992 states that a notice has to be written in a prescribed way, although the use of bill is misleading. A Council Tax Bill is not a proper, lawful bill of exchange pursuant to section 84(1), (2) of the Bills of Exchange Act. I would be glad to pay the fees demanded, only if the artificial entity can provide a lawful contract with a wet signature of the deponent and UNITED KINGDOM Government party clearly showing that I have consented to pay. Failure to provide this evidence will form a tacit agreement and relinquish any and all future debts. The harassment and illegal demand for payment will incur a fee of £10,000, including the use of intimidation and fear mongering from bailiffs to obtain monies for non-payment of Council Tax.
Court summons and liability orders: Any liability order or court summons sent to the deponent in relation to Council Tax or other debts, must first prove that the artificial entity, who claim that I have broken the law, provide a court summons or liability order from a court de jure, under common law. The deponent requests accounting from the UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN entity showing that no form of payment has been made to the Magistrates Court operating under Courts de facto, payments made to hire a room and hire artificial entities/legal fictions to rubber stamp liability orders or court summons. Bury County Court confirmed that a court summons is not issued by the Magistrates Court, but by The Council, which the deponent construes as a breach of trust, misrepresentation, and fraud at the highest level to obtain monies from the impoverished. The deponent requests that any and all future court summons or liability orders are issued by Courts de jure, under Common Law, and not legal statutes known as courts de facto, which assists only to provide monetary benefit to the UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN. In addition, a judge and/or any court administration has no lawful right to issue a court summons or liability order, without first considering the deponent’s truth, especially since the deponent has requested evidence from the artificial entity, who have failed to provide the requested contract showing the wet signature of both parties. A judge makes an oath, “I, of the family, do swear by Almighty God that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second in the office of ________, and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will.” Therefore, a judge who makes a final decision in Courts de facto about any statute law or unlawful debt is not acting under oath. As stated, only Courts de jure can make a final decision and provide the truth as to whether Council Tax or any other debt is a lawful debt. Under Common Law, the deponent has the right to request a Court de jure, should the need arise. Failure to agree to this demand will deem that the criminal justice and courts system is benefiting only the UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN, rather than the public. A court summons or liability order that is issued through a court de facto will first require a sworn declaration from the judge stating that he or she accepts full liability and was acting under Oath at the time of making the decision, or the court summons and liability order issued to my legal fiction, will be ignored, and I will levy a fee of £15,000 for failure to adhere to my demands. I will write to the court declaring that a court administrator or other CROWN entity has no lawful right to rubber stamp a court summons or liability order to obtain monies, and any documentation sent to the deponent requires a sworn statement under God admitting full liability, should the debt be unlawful. All paperwork will also be sent to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth of the House of Windsor, who swore to uphold God’s law in her Coronation, and I will specify that evidence of a signed contract has not been supplied, sworn statements were requested and have not been supplied by the court administration/judge who made the decision to send the court summons or liability order, the threat of court or further action is still in force to obtain unlawful monies, and it is necessary that a full investigation into this unlawful practice be undertaken immediately by the relevant department.
Penalty Charge Notice (PCN): The despondent has given no consent to the 72-hour contract clause given on a PCN by the UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN entity or private company. The UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN must be able to prove that the PCN is not a contract. The harassment to obtain such monies will construe that the PCN is an unlawful document, and any threat of court action is fraudulent, as the Bill of Rights Act 1969 states, “That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.” This construes that East Dorset Borough Council (RMBC) fraudulently obtained monies from me by not previously disclosing that a PCN is a contract, and only enforceable if the member of public has consented to pay the debt. I have the lawful right to park a vehicle on land without purchasing a ticket, as land belongs to the people, not the UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN. Any ticket issued will be scanned to the relevant department stating that I do not wish to contract. Take Notice that the deponent gives no permission for a UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN entity to obtain my personal details from the Driving Vehicle Licencing Authority (DVLA) with regards to obtain monies or personal possessions from the deponent in relation to a PCN. In doing so, a fee of £5,000 will be levied to RMBC. Further illegal demands for payment will each levy fines of £2,500.
Birth Certificate. The fact that a birth certificate was granted to me by a local hospital or CROWN government agency when I entered this world is irrelevant to my lawful rights as an independent human being. No status, high or low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper, without the recipient's full knowledge and consent. Therefore, such a piece of paper provides date and place information only. It indicates nothing about jurisdiction, nothing about property ownership, nothing about rights, and nothing about subject status. The only documents that can have any legal meaning, as it concerns my status in society, are those that I have signed as an adult, with full knowledge and consent, free from misrepresentation or coercion of any kind.
Declaration of Citizenship. Any document I may have ever signed, in which I answered "yes" to the question, "Are you a U.K. citizen?" - cannot be used to compromise my status as an independent human being, nor obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because without full written disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed "citizenship," provided in a document bearing my signature, given freely without misrepresentation or coercion, there can be no legally binding contract. I am not a "UNITED KINGDOM" citizen subject to its jurisdiction. The UNITED KINGDOM is a private corporation. I am not a "resident of," an "inhabitant of," a "franchise of," a "subject of," a "ward of," the "property of," the "chattel of," or "subject to the jurisdiction of" any corporate government, corporate state government, corporate county government, corporate city government, or corporate municipal body politic created under the authority of the UNITED KINGDOM corporation. I am not subject to any legislation, department, or agency created by such authorities, nor to the jurisdiction of any employees, officers, or agents deriving their authority there from.
Past voter registration. Similarly, since no obligation to perform in any manner was ever revealed in print, as part of the requirements for the supposed "privilege" to vote for government officials, any such registration on my part cannot be legal evidence of any obligation to perform. Likewise, I have granted NO jurisdiction over me, to any political office. It is my inherent right to vote on elections or issues that I feel affect all of society, NOT because I need anyone to rule over me. On the contrary - I have used the voting process only to instruct my public servants what a citizen and human being would like done.
Use of the postal code. My use of the postal code in my "address" has no effect whatsoever on my independent human status. Simply by receiving or sending "mail" through a messenger service, the postal service, at a location indicated with a postal code, cannot place me under federal jurisdiction or obligation. Such a presumption would be ludicrous. I use these codes only for the purposes of information and making it more efficacious for the U.K. Postal Service to deliver my mail.
Use of semantics. There are some immature people with mental imbalances, such as the craving to dominate other people, who masquerade as "government." Just because they alter definitions of words in the law books to their supposed advantage, doesn't mean I accept those definitions. The fact that they define the words "person," "address," "mail," "resident," "motor vehicle," "driving," "passenger," "employee," "income," and many others, in ways different from the common usage, so as to be associated with a subject or slave status, means nothing in real life. Because the courts have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to all courts and all parties, that if I have ever signed any document or spoken any words on record, using words defined by twists in the law books different from the common usage, there can be no effect whatsoever on my independent human status in society thereby, nor can there be created any obligation to perform in any manner, by the mere use of such words. Where the meaning in the common dictionary differs from the meaning in the law dictionary, it is the meaning in common dictionary that prevails, because it is more trustworthy.
Such compelled and supposed "benefits" include, but are not limited to, the aforementioned typical examples. My use of such alleged "benefits" is under duress only, and is with full reservation of all my common law rights. I have waived none of my intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use thereof. Furthermore, my use of such compelled "benefits" may be temporary, until better alternatives become available, practical, and widely recognised.
REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY
Furthermore, I hereby revoke, rescind, and make void ab initio, all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it pertains to the National Insurance (NI) number assigned to me, xx xx xx xx x as it pertains to my birth certificate, or any other licences or certificates issued by any and all UNITED KINGDOM and/or CROWN government or quasi-governmental entities, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt to deprive me of my independent human status, possessions and/or property.
Take Notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio all powers of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all quasi/colorable, public, governmental entities or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent facts.
I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that I am of lawful age and am competent to make this Affidavit. I hereby affix my own signature to all of the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and my specific common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion.
Respondent’s failure to provide the deponent with a verified rebuttal to this affidavit point-by-point no later than 10 (TEN) days from the date of issuance, or request additional time to comply, will comprise respondent’s agreement with and confession of all facts herein, in perpetuity, the said confession being res judicata and stare decisis.
All words herein are as deponent defines them.
Commercial Affidavit Oath and Verification
“I, a woman commonly known as of the family(Deponent), on my own unlimited commercial liability, certify that I have read the above affidavit and do know that the facts contained are true, correct and complete, not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”
Signed and sealed this ___________________day of _________________, 20______
All rights reserved.
of the family, in rerum natura
For verification purposes only
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me by of the family, known to me or proven to me to be the real woman signing this affidavit this _________ day of _________, 20_____.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
___________________________________ ________________ (Seal)
NOTARY PUBLIC DATE
My commission expires: __________________________, 20_____ (Stamp)
Notice of Removal of Implied Access
This should be affixed to your most external point of entrance to your property and served, if needed to illegal, enforcers of unlawful acts and statutes
To all that it concerns
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT APPLIES
Notice of Removal of Implied Right of Access
You are advised to read the following notice thoroughly and carefully. It is a lawful notice. It informs you. It means what it says. I hereby give notice that the implied right of access to the property known as <your Address> [<your Postcode>], and surrounding areas, has been removed, along with all associated property including, but not limited to, any private conveyance in respect of the following:
1) ANY employee, principal, agent, third party or representative or any other person acting on behalf of or under the instruction of HER MAJESTYS COURT SERVICE, or any other CORPORATE BODY (i.e. Company) howsoever named and,
2) ANY POLICE OFFICER who is acting for the CORPORATE POLICE and NOT acting as a Constable for and on behalf of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and her people as expressed in the Oath of Office of all POLICE men and women, that is as Public Servants, upon your Oath of Office to serve "with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property"
COMMON LAW JURISDICTION APPLIES EXCLUSIVELY
Please also take notice that the land known as England is a Common Law jurisdiction and any transgression of this notice will be dealt with Private Prosecutions according to, and under, the Common Law.
Any and all access to the above-mentioned properties shall be by strict invitation only and shall be subject to terms and conditions, available by written request.
We do not have, and have never had, a contract. And any permission that you believe you may have from me is hereby withdrawn. If you believe that you have power of attorney to act on my behalf you are hereby fired, and any consent that you believe you may have, tacit or otherwise, is hereby withdrawn. If you feel so inclined as to enforce statutes as a consequence of this matter I will report your conduct to ALL relevant bodies and will pursue Proof of Claim in affidavit form, under your full commercial liability and under the penalty of perjury.
You are deemed to have been served this notice with immediate effect.
In sincerity and honour, without ill-will, frivolity, or vexation,
<First Name: of the <Family Name> family, as commonly known, English Sovereign.
Without any admission of any liability whosoever, and with all Indefeasible Rights reserved.
This came in very handy when we found that as per Camerons speech last week you can and will be sectioned under the Mental Health Act stuffed full of pharmaceuticals classed as Psychotic for having non main stream beliefs. Now we want you all to feel free to believe whatever the heck you like. Today its mainstream here in the UK to believe in Allah, God, Torah, or so we thought. This young woman was sectioned under 2 of the mental health act for asking for a spiritualist and someone who understood energy. They labelled her Psychotic forced anti psychotic drugs into her which created side effects that need a 2nd chemical induced toxic pill for which cause secondary side effects.. this was medicated with a drug that has side effects of guess what.??? PSYCHOTIC behaviour. We are 3 pills away from being what they have classes us as. Imagine being dragged out your house and sectioned you would also show alleviated heart rate, annoyance, anger, stressed symptoms... in fact if you didn't you probably need the help. The system is psychotic in its administration and logic.
To enforce a belief on another is not acceptable and we have invaded countries around the world for less.
Use at will.
Petitioner Name: scarlett of the nolson family
Plaintiff Name: rhianne of the baines family
COVENTRY COMMON LAW COURT
Head Sheriffs office: Email: [email protected] , Tel: 07868 566 856
scarlett of the nolson family
vijay menon (dr)
Case Number: 11743
LAWFUL NOTICE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN REGARDS TO SCARLETT OF THE FAMILY NOLSON
Date: 8 October 2014
District: Head office, Coventry
TO: vijay menon C/O: Lynfied Mount Hospital, Heights Lane, Bradford
Please take note that on 11 October 2014 a petition for writ of habeas corpus will be filed to the above- entitled court.
It appearing that the applicant is entitled, there to vijay menon is directed to forthwith release scarlett of the nolson family from custody. If Scarlett is not forthwith released within three (3) calendar days after service of this lawful notice, vijay menon shall make a return certifying the true cause of the detention and shall show cause why the lawful notice should not be granted. On application to the court, for good cause additional time not exceeding 14 days may be allowed for the return.
vijay menon must state in his return plainly and unequivocally,
1, Whether he has or has not the party in his custody or power, or under his restraint.
2, If he has the party in his custody or power, or under his restraint, he must state the authority and cause of such imprisonment or restraint.
3, If the party is detained by virtue of any writ, warrant or other written authority, a copy there of must be annexed to the return and the original produced and exhibited to the court or judge on the hearing of such return.
4, If the person on whom the lawful notice is served had the party in his power or custody, or under his restraint, at any time prior or subsequent to the date of the lawful notice but transferred such custody or restraint to another, the return must state particularly to whom, at what time and place, for what cause and by what authority such transfer took place.
5, The return must be signed by the person making the same and except, when such person is a sworn public officer and makes such return in his official capacity, it must be verified by his oath.
The applicant or person detained may under oath, deny any of the facts set forth in return or allege any other material facts.
When the lawful notice or order is returned a day shall be set for hearing, not more than five (5) calendar days after the return, unless, for good cause more time is allowed.
Because the petition presents issues of fact as well as issues of law, if scarlett is constrained by actual physical force, then vijay menon is required, to produce at the hearing, the body of the person detained.
At the hearing, the court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of the matter as law and justice requires.
Rhianne of the baines family
Justice of the Peace – Coventry Common Law Court